The Straw Vulcan: Hollywood’s illogical approach to logical decisionmaking

I gave a talk at Skepticon IV last weekend about Vulcans and why they’re a terrible example of rationality. I go through five principles of Straw Vulcan Rationality(TM), give examples from Star Trek and from real life, and explain why they’re mistaken:

  1. Being rational means expecting everyone else to be rational too.
  2. Being rational means you should never make a decision until you have all the information.
  3. Being rational means never relying on intuition.
  4. Being rational means eschewing emotion.
  5. Being rational means valuing only quantifiable things — like money, productivity, or efficiency.

In retrospect, I would’ve streamlined the presentation more, but I’m happy with the content –  I think it’s an important and under-appreciated topic. The main downside was just that everyone wanted to talk to me afterwards, not about rationality, but about Star Trek. I don’t know the answer to your obscure trivia questions, Trekkies!

 

UPDATE: I’m adding my diagrams of the Straw Vulcan model of ideal decisionmaking, and my proposed revisions to it, since those slides don’t appear in the video:

The Straw Vulcan view of the relationship between rationality and emotion.

After my revisions.

About these ads

10 Responses to The Straw Vulcan: Hollywood’s illogical approach to logical decisionmaking

  1. Gordon says:

    I thought this was a great talk. I liked that you could illustrate your points with Star Trek, but you could probably have used the Big Bang Theory too.

    So thanks. Thanks a lot.

  2. Kevin says:

    I loved this talk from start to finish.

  3. opcnup says:

    I recently rewatched large chunks of Voyager. It astounded me how much I like the franchise while disliking each episode strongly for things like this.

  4. beriukay says:

    Thanks for putting up the slides! I was very frustrated when the camera didn’t pan to the revised version.

  5. Max says:

    It’s so nice, I wanna hear the same talk twice.

    As I recall, when Dan Ariely was talking about his book, The Upside of Irrationality, he said a rational person would cheat and steal if he knew he could get away with it. So you see, being rational means being a selfish immoral parasite. And you thought Spock was bad.

    An old illustration of reliance on intuition is a centipede that starts to think about how it walks, and immediately trips. You couldn’t walk or ride a bike if you had to think about every movement.

  6. Pingback: Why Spock is Not Rational | Facing the Singularity

  7. Pingback: The Virtues of Tradition « Submitted to a Candid World

  8. Pingback: 3. Why Spock is not rational « facingthesingularity

  9. Pingback: Meta-Smugness About Skeptics/Atheists/Rationalists | Fail Blue Dot

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 505 other followers

%d bloggers like this: